.
Feedback

Nassau Notebook: Hate Crimes, Jail Demotions, Pharmacist Security

A weekly look-in at the news of Nassau County.

Wave of Hate Crimes

With sudden and increasing regularity, reports of bias incidents against a broad spectrum of religious symbols and houses of worship have spread across Long Island and beyond recently.

Listed below are some of these hate and bias crimes reported in the area recently:

  • An outdoor menorah was desecrated on Gerhard Road in Plainview on the last day of the Festival of Lights, on either Dec. 26-27.
  • That same week, graffiti was scrawled on buildings along Sea Cliff's Main Avenue near St. Boniface School. Detectives said swastikas, the marijuana reference: “420,” the Klu Klux Klan moniker “White Knight” and the letters “WK” were discovered.
  • A statue of the Infant Jesus disappeared from the Nativity scene in front of St. Mary’s Church in Roslyn Harbor on Dec. 30.
  • The following week in Sea Cliff, another swastika was drawn in black marker on a Glen Avenue resident's garage door.
  • In Great Neck, swastikas were scratched into a 1998 Mercedes Benz parked at the Babylonian Jewish Center, sometime overnight on Jan. 6-7.
  • Most recently, police charged a Centerport man with throwing a glass bottle into Huntington's Masjid Noor Mosque driveway from his vehicle.
  • Nassau Police are investigating four incidents of graffiti on residential fences in Rockville Centre Jan. 19, including one involving a racist term.

Nassau Sheriff's Association Files Suit Against Demotions

The Nassau County Sheriff Officers Association filed suit in Nassau Supreme Court on behalf of the Nassau correction officers' union Friday, Jan. 13.

According to a report in Newsday, the union has challenged the demotion of 30 corporals at the county jail in East Meadow, arguing that Nassau County Executive Ed Mangano missed a Dec. 29 deadline to reduce their rank to correction officer.

The report also states that the Sheriff Officers Association has asked for the corporals to be reinstated with back pay.

According to Newsday:

The union, which represents more than 1,000 correction officers, contends the demotions Thursday reduced supervision and jeopardize safety at the jail while putting the former corporals in danger of inmate retaliation for past decisions.

A state judge denied the union's requests to lift the demotions until the case is decided, said Nassau County Attorney John Ciampoli, whose office is handling the case with outside counsel.

However, Mangano contends that the unions were well aware of the possible demotions.

"While it pains me to see anyone lose their job or demoted, I informed Nassau’s unions' presidents months ago that layoffs would occur if they did not provide the concessions needed to protect residents from a 19-percent property tax hike and live within the dollars provided to us for the 2012 budget by the County Legislature," Mangano told Patch.

Both parties are due back in court Jan. 20.

Nassau Officials Announce Local Pharmacist Security Summit

Mangano and District Attorney Kathleen Rice announced Tuesday that Nassau County’s Prescription Drug Misuse and Abuse Prevention Task Force will partner with InfraGard, an FBI public-private partnership, and the Long Island Pharmacy Crimes Task Force to offer a Pharmacist Security Summit on Feb. 7 from 8:30 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. at The Morrelly Homeland Security Center in Bethpage.

The Pharmacist Security Summit will feature representatives from the Nassau County Police Department (NCPD) and Nassau County District Attorney’s Office.  Together, they will discuss their efforts and successes in apprehending and deterring addicts from burglarizing local pharmacies for prescription opiates.

Rice will also address pending prosecutions of doctors and pharmacists accused of illegally dispensing prescription drugs and of individuals filling illegal prescriptions. Additionally, a presentation will be delivered by representatives of Purdue Pharma, the makers of Oxycodone.

Law enforcement officials have created a list of vulnerable pharmacies in Nassau County and are tracking and arresting criminals guilty of drug diversion – from doctors who overprescribe to those who obtain the pills fraudulently and/or sell their own prescriptions.

LIPA Audit Bill Passes State Assembly

The New York State Assembly on Wednesday passed legislation that requires the Long Island Power Authority to undergo "comprehensive and operational audits," according to a press release from Assemblyman Harvey Weisenberg, D-Long Beach.

The goal of the Long Island Power Authority Oversight and Accountability Act (A.8957) is to address LIPA's "out-of-control spending and questionable business practices."

Plans Call for NUMC to Hire Non-Union Workers

Officials at Nassau University Medical Center (NUMC), the county's only public hospital, are planning to create a non-profit subsidiary that would allow them to hire non-union employees.

The new entity would be called NuHealth Services Corp., which would co-run the East Meadow-based hospital, according to documents submitted to New York State Health Department

County Launches Inventors and Entrepreneurs Club

Mangano announced Wednesday the creation of the "Inventors and Entrepreneur Club of Nassau County." The organization will provide a network for local inventors and entrepreneurs to collaborate and learn from experts.

The club will provide novice and seasoned entrepreneurs networking and brainstorming opportunities in a safe and secure environment. With a primary goal of helping turn ideas into action, the club will provide assistance in all aspects of the inventing process and enable members to tap into critical resources. Fueled by monthly guest expert speakers, the organization will provide assistance to local inventors in each step of the innovation process.

The club is set to meet monthly in the Ceremonial Chambers of the Theodore Roosevelt County Executive and Legislative Building, 1550 Franklin Ave., Mineola. The first meeting is scheduled to take place on Tuesday, Jan. 31 at 7 p.m.

Kristen Ferrari April 13, 2012 at 12:41 pm
And Simba,
Another reason I say the government is because there was news recently about spending money to send pamplets to every home so people can track their prescriptions. How many people will use that pamphlet? Does anyone think that is the solution or even helpful? A pamphlet? It doesn't even begin to address the dysfunction that goes on in some homes or the problems behind the addiction. The person who would hang that pamphlet and mark it is most likely careful about monitoring their prescription. The people that leave them lying around or doctor shop are certainly not hanging that pamphlet in their medicine cabinet. So far, that has been my local official's best idea.
Kristen Ferrari April 13, 2012 at 12:43 pm
Fred,
It isn't treated as a medical problem. When are we going to see that filling the jails is not ridding us of drugs? The US will never end the war on drugs. There's too much money in it. Instead there will be some story that really hits people hard, the elected officials will all show up and give speeches, people will scream about the drug dealers and addicts, and then everyone will go back to their everyday life. At least, that's how its been to date.
Kristen Ferrari April 13, 2012 at 12:45 pm
Concerned,
I will never forget Eddie Byrne getting murdered by drug dealers at the height of the crack epidemic. There were all sorts of promises by the politicians that drugs would be eradicated. You are right that it needs to be a combined effort. Of course people committing crimes deserve to be punished, but we need more education as well as early interventions.
Tom Garrett April 13, 2012 at 02:26 pm
Hehehehe, The War on Drugs...... Here's an Op-Ed piece written by David W. Fleming and James P. Gray in the LA Times in 2008.
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jul/05/opinion/oe-fleming5 I think they have some valid points but having the Government in charge is where I take some issue with them, as for the "MONEY" the figures are mind numbing as to how much we as a Society have spent and are still in the same spot!!!! Addiction, as I stated before is individual in nature and how one gets there is irrelevant but what one does when they are, is truly what matters. Our mindset on drugs as a Society needs to change. We as a Society did just that when we ended prohibition……
Strug Lynn April 13, 2012 at 02:52 pm
Here is a point I am wondering if anyone else considered. Nassau County/Mangano is not forming task forces to protect people who own gas staions or 7-11's. They are not spending our tax dollars having security summits and forming committees to figure out how to protect banks on the tax payers dime. So why are the Pharmacy owners and Pharmacists, drug companies and prescribers not paying to protect themselves and researching the best way to keep their profit flowing? Why are WE tax payers footing the bill??????
Bleep April 13, 2012 at 02:56 pm
aww frank, did i say feed them more drugs? oh no i didnt. what i said was that prisons dont work because they still get drugs into the prison and distribute them as the dealer in the prison see's fit. with that being said that means that sending druggies into prison does not work. stop reading to far into what i say Frank. it's not healthy.
Kristen Ferrari April 13, 2012 at 03:42 pm
Strug Lynn, your point is valid. Long before pharmacies were getting robbed, gas stations, banks, and liquor stores were targets. The bottom line though is that the tax payers will always be paying in some way whether it is through jails, programs in jails, detox units, and rehabs, or even task forces created by law makers and other diversion programs. That is why I suggest that none of that so far is working. We have not won this war on drugs and all it has done is cost money and lives.
Wanting to work on ways to cure addiction or alleviate it is not the same as wanting to fund drug habits or give a free pass. This drug problem is affecting all of us. We don't have to be the addict to have this epidemic touch our lives in some way.
Kristen Ferrari April 13, 2012 at 03:46 pm
Tom,
That article made a lot of sense. Its a shame that more people don't see the points made. Thanks for sharing it.
Frank April 13, 2012 at 04:03 pm
@ Bleep. if you read my blogs, I said the Rockefeller laws are extreme (draconian in fact) for the recreational drug user. So try reading instead of skimming like you did in high school.
fred April 13, 2012 at 04:18 pm
I agree with you Kristen! Was there ever a time it was about people and not money?
Bleep April 13, 2012 at 04:43 pm
@ FRANK (because you seem to make people targets).
instead of reading between the non existant lines of what i wrote instead of taking a slight compliment. read what the bloody hell im writting. AGAIN i'll repeat this. Sending people to prisons dont work because a. they're able to get the drugs because people get these drugs inside the prisons and they get highly paid for it. (and guess what your guards are one of the many that get it within the prisons. not saying all do it but there are enough). b. when they get out; they aren't always clean, they learn more criminal activities inside prison then they would elsewhere.so when they get arrested again put them under repeat offender list. c. i read your post, AND ITS IRRELEVANT TO WHAT MY POINT IS. hence why i didnt comment about it. stop acting like a highschool student yourself. your retiring soon correct? d. your still reading to far into what im saying. again it's not healthy.
Tommy Moore April 13, 2012 at 06:40 pm
TG
Your points on giving up on the war on drugs are completely misguided. The point is that we have not fought i correctly. It is time we stop worrying about treatment and detox centers and the rest. If this really is a war treat it like a war and dont waste time punishing or treating these animals, instead just execute them all. We need to realize all the add on problems these addicts cause in society and realize they are just not worth saving.
Bleep April 13, 2012 at 08:15 pm
well that will kill off right about everybody then. be careful if you have kids they might be smoking a lil weed and end up being executed too!
please think reasonably. and that one is not reasonable weather its a "war on drugs" or not.
Tommy Mooree April 13, 2012 at 08:24 pm
Bleep
I stand by my comments - these animals need to be executed.
Bleep April 13, 2012 at 08:35 pm
Tommy Mooree
ok and i'm standing by what i said that your comment is completely phycho. executing them doesnt stop the drugs from being distributed.
Kristen Ferrari April 13, 2012 at 08:46 pm
Such lovely thoughts, Tommy Moore. Maybe you should consider heading some extremist group in a country where death squads are acceptable. I hope that if you have kids that they never get caught up in anything. I'm sure you never made a mistake in your life so its perfectly natural that you would assume every person who ever struggled with addiction is an animal.
Why not take your idea to the Supreme Court. Have the Constitution amended and allow death squads to take out anyone who struggles with addiction? Its truly wonderful having such an intelligent discussion on an important issue with people like you.
Frank April 13, 2012 at 09:17 pm
Did anyone catch the latest pharmacy robbery on the news? http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/13/nyregion/robber-killed-after-east-harlem-drugstore-holdup-police-say.html
just goes to show you how desperate people are to get high and how brazen enablers are to get and supply those narcotics. I say: 1. Treat the addicts as best as possible. Push for broader intervention and greater familial say. Addicts cannot be forced to go for treatment unless they are court ordered. That has to change; A parent, sibling, and child, for that matter, should be given more sway in that decision. An addict is not in the right state of mind to begin with. 2. Continue to incarcerate those that commit felonies and other crimes against society. Addict or not, if you break the law, you must be punished. 3. Severely punish dealers and distributors. They are abusing a weak and vulnerable human condition for sheer profit. That is evil and they should be dealt with in kind. i am not proposing to execute addicts; but I think executing dealers and distributors is not far from the realm of possibility. In China, they execute dealers. http://rt.com/news/china-to-execute-more-african-drug-dealers/ And China is not the only country where this practice is common.
Tom Garrett April 13, 2012 at 11:43 pm
Mr. Moore,
No Sir, it is you that is completely misguided and uninformed, this is not a WAR on anything, that’s just a straw man argument, this is nothing more than a MONEY LAUNDERING operation from the top on down and its being played upon the backs of the weak and addicted.... Take a look at the number of people in our Country that are addicted to either alcohol, drugs legal or not and tobacco.... http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2003/sep/6/20030906-120039-1281r/ Still standing by your word........ You can watch how much MONEY is wasted by the second at the top of the page......... http://actionamerica.org/drugs/wodclock.shtml Here's some history on the War on Drugs, if you take the time you will see what an absolute waste of time and resources it has been...... http://civilliberty.about.com/od/drugpolicy/tp/War-on-Drugs-History-Timeline.htm btw: Tell me one good reason why Oxycodone is dispensed locally?
Helen Doyle April 14, 2012 at 03:16 am
this is the only way that our pharmacy will be safe from being shot at etc. What a shame that we have to do this??
Helen Doyle April 14, 2012 at 03:20 am
I worked for specialists in Orthopedics and there was no offer to give a patient pain medication. If the patient asks for the pain killer the doctors know if they are legitimate.
Not all doctors are like what you say. I know !! Been there !!
fred April 14, 2012 at 12:31 pm
The only thing executing people will do is drive prices to much higher levels. When there is more money involved you can be sure there will be a lot more corruption( if that is possible). I would give addicts as much drugs as they need so they are not a danger to society only to themselves!
Dave Kloven April 14, 2012 at 12:41 pm
Frank, I the Rockerfeller Laws are not Draconian... They are designed for the repeat offender that refuses to comply with the laws of society .... Im sorry that the occasional junkie got slammed by the system, but slamming junkies also serves a purpose ... It serves as a deterent for other drug abusers to either clean up or get sent to a warehouse for a few years... Sending these junkies to jail also drives home burglaries,robberies etc down..... Most importantly, the repeal of the Rockerfeller laws is a huge victory for the drug dealers.. They recieve substantially less jail time now, so they are right back out on the street deaing drugs, shooting at drug dealers and killing cops...@ Bleep, I read your comments, you sound a little bitter towards the Legal System.... Probably because your missing a bunch of friends and family at your summer cook outs ....
Kristen Ferrari April 14, 2012 at 12:59 pm
Dave,
The Rockefeller laws did not reduce crime nor did they act as a deterrent. It did not reduce crime nor did it put a dent in addiction. It was repealed because as our then Governor stated, "I can't think of a criminal justice strategy that has been more unsuccessful than the Rockefeller Drug Laws." Do you really think that someone in the throes of addiction considers the consequences of his actions? An addict would lose his family for his drug. Do you really believe that sending them to jail cures that or solves that? And please, before you tell me that I'm giving a pass to criminals, I'm not. And yes, I do know people who have become addicts and alcoholics. They are not all animals as some people claim here. I'm sure you know and love a few too. You just may not realize it.
Bleep April 14, 2012 at 03:45 pm
Hi Dave,
Bitter? not really. But reality is that the legal system sucks and that's my opinion due to things i've learned along the way. Now your 2nd line is borderline rude. don't make assumptions about people over the internet.
Dave Kloven April 14, 2012 at 04:58 pm
If someone needs help, they should ask for it and receive it. But repeat offenders need to be warehoused away from society ( and their drug dealers). Their substance abuse problems cause them to commit acts of violence against innocent people. This can not be tolerated. Asking for a drug program after you've been arrested is a way criminals get easy sentences. It's a farce. The state loves it because it's cheaper to send someone to some bs drug program then it is to incarcerate these people. It's called the revolving door criminal justice system. I say build more prisons and put these people away. Someone that gets arrested for selling crack 3 times doesn't need a drug program they need to be sent far,far away for a long time. You need to stop feeling bad for these dirtbags. They don't feel bad when they break into your house, rob you at gunpoint or shoot an innocent kid that happens to be riding his bike behind a rival drug .
Kristen Ferrari April 14, 2012 at 05:31 pm
Dave,
I'm not talking about fixing a drug problem only after a person is arrested for a crime. A drug problem begins long before that. I'm talking about addressing an issue before it turns into addiction or crime. I'm also talking about treating addiction as the medical problem that it is. You don't have to be an addict to have addiction harm you. As I said before, executing people or locking them away will not bring back people lost to crime or drugs. Why not look at working on addiction as a preventative to crime.
Simba April 14, 2012 at 10:00 pm
If you want more prisons, you want more taxes. Why not ask what are current tax dollars are doing with the likes of the DEA. Or how about all the billions we are spending in Afghanistan only to have poppy continue to be farmed, or how about the millions we give to Mexico and the bang up job they are doing controlling their own people. Do you really want the Gov't to do more, when they are clueless as to what to do.
Dave Kloven April 15, 2012 at 12:44 pm
Simba, I would bet more of my tax dollar goes to social programs that harbor drug dealers/addicts (drug programs, food stamps,welfare,section 8, medicaid, methedone clinics etc.) then to the DEA .. Just think, everytime one of these idiots gets stabbed, shot etc. and goes to the hospital, who pays? ....not them, they have no insurance and the hospital is mandated to treat them and we wonder why health insurance is so high......... who pays for their free public defenders?? .... not them, we do ... They are a huge drain on the system and it afects us at every level..
Simba April 15, 2012 at 01:48 pm
2.02 billion dollar budget is not chump change. My point is not that they are a drain on our system, it's what is the 2.02 billion doing about the problem.
Kristen Ferrari April 15, 2012 at 03:12 pm
Dave, those are all perfect reasons for us to try to look at addiction. In the end we pay whether through programs or treatment. What's so wrong with wanting to work on the addiction end with the idea that we'd need less jails, and social programs? I'm kind of curious as to why you ignore that aspect of it. After all, there are a lot of addicts who aren't committing crimes but they're still costing you money. You're only looking at it from a punitive aspect. What of the many who don't require punitive action?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Levittown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Michael Ganci (Editor) May 31, 2013 at 12:14 pm
Thanks for sharing! We have reposted in top news and shared on Facebook. Let us know how things go!Read More MG
United States Marine
Mickey June 13, 2013 at 09:56 am
God Bless you for your upcoming service PVt. Montalvo!! Levittown is proud of you and theRead More sacrifices you are making. I too am a DAHS grad... way back in '63! Semper Fi Blue Dragon!
Nina Marie Arnold-Orlando June 11, 2013 at 09:10 am
is this the one Susan Lucci promotes? Ir so i want it
Robin Boyce June 11, 2013 at 12:26 pm
Yes, this is the one that Susan Lucci promotes...it was originally bought from HSN. Asking price isRead More $175